| Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Three Different Glass Hybrid Restorations in High Caries Risk Patients: A Randomized Control Trial |
| Paper ID : 1089-YRC2022 |
| Authors |
|
Rabab Ismail abdelfattah Hegazi *1, Wael essam jamil2, Ahmed Fawzy Abo El-ezz3 1Suez canal university 2Al Azhar 3Suez Canal |
| Abstract |
| The current study was conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of three glass hybrid restorations; Nano-ionomer restoration (Ketac Nano), Reactive ionomer glass fillers (Activa bioactive) and Alkasite restorative material (Cention N) in class I cavity in high caries risk patients after one year. Materials & methods: 15 high caries risk patients with three or more class I occlusal pits and fissure caries in posterior teeth. Three class I cavities were performed for each patient and restored randomly with Ketac nanoTM, Activa bioactiveTM and Cention NTM. All three restorations were applied according to manufacturers’ instructions. Restorations were evaluated at baseline(immediately), after three months, six months and one year by two blinded assessors using FDI criteria for assessment of dental restorations measuring (Functional and Biological) properties. results: ActivaTM bioactive restoration had better functional properties than Ketac nanoTM and Cention NTM, while Ketac nanoTM had superior biological properties than the other competing restorations. |
| Keywords |
| Randomized control trial, High caries risk, Activa bioactive, ketac nano, Cention n, glass hybrid restorations |
| Status: Accepted (Poster Presentation) |
